I have gone through the charts that i have traded today.
I also have a question for Immy

I have not traded the second pullbacks as i dont really know when?! A little embarrassed about being clueless in this matter.
THE DAY
Hi Emmaeaxh wrote: 31 Jan 2022, 18:57 I have entered a new stage in my trading. Or should i say in my view in trading. As i understand more i also want crystalclear rules so i can maintain objective.
I have gone through the charts that i have traded today.
I also have a question for Immy
I have not traded the second pullbacks as i dont really know when?! A little embarrassed about being clueless in this matter.31.01.2022_19.48.14_REC QUESTION.png
THE DAY 31.01.2022_19.29.14_REC DAX REVIEW.png
31.01.2022_19.39.12_REC NAS REVIEW.png
31.01.2022_19.45.08_REC DOW REVIEW.png
Thank you for the answer. I will try to start taking them when its trending nicely, want to take away my mental blockimmy wrote: 31 Jan 2022, 20:55Hi Emmaeaxh wrote: 31 Jan 2022, 18:57 I have entered a new stage in my trading. Or should i say in my view in trading. As i understand more i also want crystalclear rules so i can maintain objective.
I have gone through the charts that i have traded today.
I also have a question for Immy
I have not traded the second pullbacks as i dont really know when?! A little embarrassed about being clueless in this matter.31.01.2022_19.48.14_REC QUESTION.png
THE DAY 31.01.2022_19.29.14_REC DAX REVIEW.png
31.01.2022_19.39.12_REC NAS REVIEW.png
31.01.2022_19.45.08_REC DOW REVIEW.png
I know the feeling
My idea is that I want to be in the first pullback, if I havethen its far easier for me to take the 2nd pullback. if the TREND is up, we don't really need Breakout phase for the 2nd pullback, just a pullback is enough.
hope his helps
cheers
Just thought I'll add this to it.eaxh wrote: 01 Feb 2022, 07:50Thank you for the answer. I will try to start taking them when its trending nicely, want to take away my mental blockimmy wrote: 31 Jan 2022, 20:55Hi Emmaeaxh wrote: 31 Jan 2022, 18:57 I have entered a new stage in my trading. Or should i say in my view in trading. As i understand more i also want crystalclear rules so i can maintain objective.
I have gone through the charts that i have traded today.
I also have a question for Immy
I have not traded the second pullbacks as i dont really know when?! A little embarrassed about being clueless in this matter.31.01.2022_19.48.14_REC QUESTION.png
THE DAY 31.01.2022_19.29.14_REC DAX REVIEW.png
31.01.2022_19.39.12_REC NAS REVIEW.png
31.01.2022_19.45.08_REC DOW REVIEW.png
I know the feeling
My idea is that I want to be in the first pullback, if I havethen its far easier for me to take the 2nd pullback. if the TREND is up, we don't really need Breakout phase for the 2nd pullback, just a pullback is enough.
hope his helps
cheers
Its helpful!
Cheers
Oh I took the 2nd trade as you as well and exited at the high, that was my intention. it was slow AF and I hate slow movers.eaxh wrote: 01 Feb 2022, 11:20 FORECAST AND PREP
NEWS RED US NEWS AT 16:00
D1 Wide range
H1 Trading range
THOUGHTS AND TRADES
Trade 7.
Dax broke out to the upside and the impuls ended with a slow down pattern and made a signal 1 to go long. As it was a mico pullback on M5 after a strong TC i went long IFFY as h*ll.
Hit 2 R within 1 minute.
Ds1
01.02.2022_09.17.43_REC Trade 7.png
Trade 8
Valid. Continuation on M5 setup. Trade 9
Valid. BE
01.02.2022_10.20.36_REC Trade LO.png
Hi, Emmaeaxh wrote: 01 Feb 2022, 15:21 NEOThe first filtered signal is filtered based on the level on M5 (Range Low) .
01.02.2022_16.13.59_REC trades NEO.png
I did half good in this session. The pullback was impulsive. Not Ds1
You are 100% correct!! I appreciate your honesty!immy wrote: 01 Feb 2022, 18:50Hi, Emmaeaxh wrote: 01 Feb 2022, 15:21 NEOThe first filtered signal is filtered based on the level on M5 (Range Low) .
01.02.2022_16.13.59_REC trades NEO.png
I did half good in this session. The pullback was impulsive. Not Ds1
You took a lovely trade this am, and afternoon session was also not bad.
Let me help you understand what happened here. From a second person's point of view and with objectivity. Not trying to appease or insult you. Simply stating the facts from my objective point of view. (objectivity can also be a bit relative).
You did not trade the first one, based on a filter. That's fine, but I can say, that perhaps in the back of your mind you were protecting your previous profits. It's possible but probably yes or no. You will know better if you think hard.
Second point, the trade that you took is a CLEAR sign of FOMO. Otherwise, you'd now, with benefit of hindsight, agree that the quality of the first trade was much higher than the second.
Hope it makes sense.
cheers Immy