arjanbg wrote:I noticed later yesterday I couldn t let go. Of sharing my way on thinking on the previous post. This doesnt make me right, but can only be concluded that I pay too much attention on Elliot waves count instead of the 3 rules of AIMS. Therefore I miss the W1-W2 setups.
Significant timeframe lower, than you want to trade:
(Grounded) Peak then cross of ZL and Peak again with divergence = Elliott Wave
(Ungrounded) W1-W5 occurs, this will be time to see ABC.
Timeframe you want to
(Grounded) Peak then cross of ZL, now momentum is near the ZL of AO
(Ungrounded) W1-W4 occurs, setup for W5. For P5 we can draw a trendline and this will show divergence between the price and AO. The setup for P5 is there if price breaks the tendline.
So my thinking was that what is the elliot wave count. ABC on a significant lower timeframe will create the W5 on a higher timeframe.
With due respect, I'd like to state that ...
its still a bit too confusing for me. I just stick to simple flow chart analysis.
That's why I suggested you watch those 2 or 3 videos and that is my recommendation to anyone. Is there a dot, is gator sleeping, is purple correct, is the box size ok, are there are levels to the left. etc etc... make it simple objective and then after you've created setup 1 or 2 you cannot apply further things to it. Once it says take the trade, you take the trade. thats it.
What is the Secret of Successful Trading?
The Consistent Pursuit of
DS1
The thing that makes me money in trading is when I
"Objectively Follow my Trading Plan".
I understand that I can't catch all the moves or all the signals but my objective is to catch
THE VALID SIGNALS & ONLY the Valid Signals.
My Deathbed Advice "5:1 Reward to Risk Ratio".
Yo, banana boy!
